Flames engulf a forest near Badkot in Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand. The State has been under a dry spell this year with either scanty or no rainfall in most areas. Photo: Virender Singh Negi |
Wildfires are an annual occurrence in
Uttarakhand, though they have been bigger and more widespread in 2016. The fire
season usually begins from mid-February and lasts until mid-June, when the
rains arrive. In 2016, the fires started early — the first incident was
reported on February 2. In Himachal, the first fire was reported on April 7.
Their frequency and intensity increased after April 25, the day the state saw
80 incidents of fire.
Forest under fire in Uttarakhand's Barkot region. Photo: Virender Negi |
Causes of forest fires
More than 95% of wildfires in India were
man-made,
1. People instigate forest fires by burning dry chir leaves.
2. Villagers burn leaves and grass in order to get better growth of
grass the following year.
3. Forest dwellers burn the needles of the chir pine, which form a
slippery carpet on the ground.
4. In the Terai region, honey collectors start fires to drive away
bees.
5. Utter failure of human institutions at several levels, such as,
built up a highly inflammable Chir-pine dead leaves in a forest prone area and
diversion of water for unsustainable tourism activities despite the foreseeable
danger of forest fire.
6. The diversion of spring water for human uses gradually decreased the
moisture content of the forest floor which in turn makes it more susceptible to
catch fire. This unsustainable nature of increasing tourism in the state adds
to the adversity.
7. The residents of Uttrakhand villages migrate on a mass scale in
search of better economic opportunities. These villages that would previously
check the buildup of highly inflammable Chir pine were absent to perform
necessary preventive and remedial functions.
IMPACT
The fire which was bound to occur in the
Chir pine forests also spread the to the undisturbed and remote oak forests
which shelters several species of birds and animals, is essential for their
survival and breeding and such unpredictable wildfire can even lead to local
extinction of species.
Moreover oak forests are very important for
the local villages, as their dead leaves are used as compost for terrace
farming; it also provides fodder for milk producing cattle which is an
important source of animal protein. Its loss could be devastating for the local
village economy. This is strongly indicative of failure of human institutions
at different levels.
The real losses however, are ecological and
social — those of biodiversity, timber, soil moisture and nutrients, etc.,
besides the environmental impact of heavy smoke rising from the fires.
Management
1. Replacement of Chir pine trees with others suitable trees to be
carried out scientifically.
2. Selective felling of Chir pine and gradual replacement.
3. Villagers those are not willing to stay back could be provided with
appropriate incentives such as development of lucrative forest based
industries.
4. Effective mass utilization of pine needles with the help of
technological and industrial support could create employment opportunities for
villagers and simultaneously solve the problem.
5. Use the traditional method of “beating the fire down” with green
branches..
6. Use of Mi-17s flying sorties to dump water picked from the Bhimtal
lake and the Srinagar, Garhwal, reservoir over the affected areas of Kumaon and
Garhwal.
7. Banning people from carrying matchboxes to forests.
8. Awareness campaigns.
9. More modern systems of fire monitoring alongside traditional methods
like maintaining fire lines, so there is a clearing between two forests to
prevent the fire from spreading from one to the other.
10. Greater interaction between villagers and the Forest Department for
bridging information utilization hiatus, and research extension hiatus.
In Himachal too,
“fire beating” and clearing of “fire lines” is under way.
11. Adoption of “counter fire” with forest officials starting fires from
the opposite end of a forest to check the flames at a defined boundary.
Government
response
The post fire scenario does was met with a
typical knee-jerk reaction by the Government and with a little luck by
rainfall. The government is also proposed mass cutting of Chir pine forest (a
knee-jerk reaction) as it is the so-called “culprit” for the forest fire. While
it is imperative to note that, other than the general virtues of a natural
forest, Chir pine forests are unique. Chir pine trees are not harmful they
instead have a lot of benefits such as Turpentine oil, Rosin, handicraft,
aesthetics, curing respiratory problems and they perform vital ecological
services as well. Mass deforestation of Chir pain would adversely affect
Uttrakhand’s ecology and the glaciers and consequently India.
Conclusion
Though Uttrakhand forest fire was a natural
event, it was certainly human factors which made its occurrence more favorable.
Post fire management shall play a crucial part in restoring the forest;
however, biodiversity once lost cannot be restored. This could be taken as a
lesson to focus more on prevention rather than cure.
Importance of local wisdom in combating forest fire
What
is Local Wisdom
Local wisdom is a body of knowledge which
has evolved with the life experiences of people.
Before the advent of capitalism, growth of
nationalism and globalization, there were small communities which used to take
care of their natural and cultural heritage. These communities constitute a
group of people who share similar hopes and goals who has a sense of unity and
maintain a stable identity in the face of rapid societal change.
However with the growth of globalization,
these communities are now heavily influenced by the so called “modern” ideas of
the western countries which gave them a sense of backwardness about themselves.
The result- abandonment of their valuable heritage- local wisdom.
The rural communities in India which
originally led a holistic life which put much emphasis on community building by
working as a team, respecting elders and working with the nature have however
been undergoing significant changes steadily. These communities are replacing
their local wisdom with western ideas of technology, individualism,
consumerism, production centric work, etc due to which they have started to
identify themselves as backward, rural and poor. This thought proved to be
quite costly in Uttrakhand.
The issue of removal of pine needles from
the forests could not be addressed due to an indirect issue of mass migration.
The villager’s unwillingness to stay in the village could not be ensure due to
which there was a lack of man power to carry out essential procedures which
could have prevented the fire. The villages are not willing to stay back due to
economic concerns.
The communities which were initially
self-sufficient in managing their resources, facing natural calamities,
community recreation and issues with the gradual weathering away of their
heritage are becoming more and more dependent on the Government to solve their
day-to-day problems. These communities, which were initially assets to India,
are now totally dependent on the Government to solve their problems.
Uttrakhand, which has historically seen
NGOs and civil society groups perform strong advocacy role such as, Chipko
movement as weathering away. Today such organizations have lost their loyalty
to several donor funded projects. Some of them have even accepted project terms
according to which they effectively lose their critical and questioning voice.
Also, the National Policy for Forest Fire
presently focuses on international technology transfer and international
training program. In the present plan the flow of information and technology is
mainly from top to bottom, i.e. from the Government and allied agencies to the
rural areas. Technology, which is the application of scientific knowledge for
practical purposes, must flow both ways. However, sadly the local wisdom, i.e.
the local knowledge gained from living in balance with nature is ignored. Local
knowledge can be both abstract and concrete. But its importance lies in the
fact that it is derived from the practical experiences of life events. The
national policy to tackle forest fire could have been more effective has it
been inclusive of the local wisdom.
Uttrakhand which is losing its heritage of
state-people partnership and local wisdom must revive it, spread it and
replicate it- that is the obvious conclusion.
Questions
1.
Although the forest fires
destroy a large area, they are called natural events. What makes them natural
events and beneficial. Discuss
2.
Forest fires are as much
natural as man made. In this light, discuss its causes.
3.
The disruption of culture and
natural livehood was the main factor responsible for Uttarakhand forest fires.
Analyse the statement with its concurrent impact.
4.
The management of forest fires
must be by preserving local sentiments and knowledge as well as by conjunctive
use of modern techniques.
5.
In view of the nature of the
causes of forest fires, the government's response must focus on forestry
management and heritage management rather than on knee jerk reaction.
6.
What do you understand by local
wisdom in the light of forest fires and to what extant local wisdoms can be
helpful in solving the problems of fires in sustainable manner.
No comments:
Post a Comment